Ritchie Sinclair: From Artist to “Con-artist”

“Who are you, other than a figment of your own imagination…?”

Peter Jacobsen one of Canada's top experts on libel and defamtion advised CTVglobemedia to settle out of court with Michael Moniz, for an estimated $25,000 for falsely libeling him and defaming his genuine Morrisseau paintings as fakes.

Peter Jacobsen, one of Canada’s top experts on libel and defamation, in 2009, advised CTVglobemedia to settle out of court with Michael Moniz, for an estimated $25,000 for falsely libeling him as a crook and defaming his genuine Morrisseau paintings as fakes.  The forensics did it for Michael.

Peter Jacobsen, speaks about Ontario Conservative Leader’s Hudak’s statements for which Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne says, she’ll take him to court for libel and defamation.

“… making false and extremely damaging statements and I think that is where the line is drawn between free expression in our society and defamation. I am a tremendous advocate of free expression, but I think that where it can do a lot of harm to the whole concept of free expression is if we’re going to allow people, with impunity, to make statements that are blatantly untrue, and they won’t back them up…

“There is nothing to substantiate these (Hudak’s – ed: substitute “Sinclair’s”) statements, that we know of.” (CBC, The Current, April 1, 2014)

Jacobsen might much more correctly have been talking about Ritchie Sinclair, and his totally wild, false, and unsubstantiated claims of fakes, that have been completely rejected by numerous judges, and top forensic scientists.

But Sinclair’s wild rantings, have, by one estimate, been destructive of Norval Morrisseau’s art valuations to the tune of some $100 million, and have cut a destructive swath through the art valuations of all First Nations artists.

Four judges (Lederer, Godfrey, Martial, and Sanderson) have all rejected Sinclair’s claims as unproven and without evidence to back him up.

Six judges have impugned, or “rejected” outright, in specifics, the integrity, the expertise, the expert reports, & the claims of Sinclair and Robinson (Mogan 1996, Lederer 2008, Godfrey 2011, Martial 2013, Lacavera 2013, & Sanderson 2013)

In 2008 The Hon Justice Thomas R Lederer, after reading Sinclair’s Defence against a multi-dealer lawsuit, wrote tellingly, in what would always be a familiar refrain, in court after court:

“The defendant in this case (Sinclair) says he will defend the action by claiming the defamatory statements are true. No demonstration of the basis for this defence has been produced to this point.”

And more even more damningly:

“The (Sinclair) website suggests that a large number of the pictures to which it refers are ‘stolen, forgeries, counterfeit or otherwise inauthentic.’

“ It is difficult to believe that the defendant has had an opportunity to examine all the images referred to on the website against the list of factors to which he refers. Moreover, the website does not demonstrate or discuss any specific evidence demonstrating the failure of any image to satisfy all of these factors. There is nothing but the bald statement that they are frauds or counterfeits.” (The Hon Justice Thomas R Lederer, Dec. 4, 2008) (ed: my underlining)

 Indeed, nothing would ever change, over the next six years. to alter the telling accusation and validity of Justice Lederer’s damning final sentence.

Three judges (Godfrey, Martial, Sanderson) in cases dealing with allegations of specific fakes, have ruled totally and entirely against the claims of Sinclair and Robinson, and totally in favour of ruling the paintings they slanged, as being, to the contrary, authentic, in the absolute.

Hundreds of pages of court transcripts document numerous lies, and acts of perjury by Sinclair, a habit for which he was deliberately cited before the Hon Madam Justice Mary Anne Sanderson in Ontario Superior Court, on Dec. 6, 2013. In her judgment, she concurred when it was brought to her attention by, Brian Shiller, the winning lawyer in both the Martial trial and the subsequent Sanderson Appeal.

“I may suggest to you that the trial judge (ed: Deputy Judge Paul J Martial) could have easily condemned Mr. Sinclair as a liar, and chose not to… And I put it to you, as to your shaking your head that you’ve read this part of the evidence. It was crystal clear in my submission that Mr. Sinclair was caught in a lie.” (Trial & Appeal Winning Defence Lawyer Brian Shiller, during the Appeal before The Hon Madam Justice Mary Anne Sanderson, Ontario Superior Court, from personal notes: taken Dec. 6, 2013)

“The trial judge was entitled to reject the evidence of Sinclair and to conclude it was unsupported and unreliable. Sinclair could produce no documentary evidence to support his assertion that a well organized forgery ring painted the works auctioned by Khan Auctions.” (item 18, Ontario Superior Court 2013 ONSC 7801 Divisional Court File no. 209/13, the Judgment by the Hon Madam Justice Mary Anne Sanderson, Dec 17, 2013)

Exposed: the Secret Life of an Indian Imposter

“If you can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” WC Fields

For slow readers, who can’t wade through the academic documentation exposing the HOAX, we offer this pictorial snapshot of its chief “enforcer,” his bogus claims of expertise and faux credentials, and the utterly dim view of him and his claims expressed by numerous respected Deputy Judges, Judges and Justices, of numerous Ontario courts.

The Sad Demise of a Baby Genius – For slow readers, who can’t wade through the academic documentation exposing the HOAX, we offer this pictorial snapshot of its chief “enforcer,” his bogus claims of expertise and faux credentials, and the utterly dim view of him and his claims expressed by numerous respected Deputy Judges, Judges and Justices, of numerous Ontario courts. It is a sad end of an artist who is probably the very first in history to show promise at such an early age, telling Judge Martial, “Actually I began formal training (in art) at the age of four.”  SADLY, SINCLAIR HAD A BAD TEACHER, OR WAS A POOR LEARNER. IN 2004, HIS ACRYLIC ART WORKS ON CANVAS WERE SELLING AT RANDY POTTER AUCTIONS FOR $25, $30, AND $50… WHEN THEY MANAGED TO GET A BID… NOT A PARTICULARLY GOOD RESULT FOR A 47 YEAR OLD ARTIST… Clearly he needed to find another career… How about as an “enforcer” for a Hoax alleging Morrisseau fakes…?

courtroom

The Conspiracy Theory Collaborators Outside the Court – This is probably the most damaging photo ever published about a judicial proceeding in Canadian history; I predict it will be used in legal text books, by generations of lawyers to come. We kid you not: it’s the so-called “expert witness,” Donald Robinson, “thumbing his nose” at the judge, inside the building behind, by deliberately cozying up to the Plaintiff and documenting the affront with a compromisingly partisan photo that is a flagrant breach of Canadian court protocol. An “expert witness” is supposed to be an “arm’s length” witness, to help the judge establish truth, not join one of the partisan litigants in a “pals” photo. What does that say about his independence, and his credibility as a  supposed “friend of the court?” Sinclair (AKA The Baby Genius) center and Robinson right, outside the courtroom where the tag-team performed for Conspiracy Theorist Proxy #4, Margaret Hatfield. The association has cost the gullible and horribly misled schoolmarm some $58,000 in legal costs, drained from her pension, wasted on a case she could never hope to win. Judge Martial was not impressed, at all, by Donald Robinson as an “expert witness” – even less so of Ritchie Sinclair. He ended up totally “rejecting” Sinclair’s testimony, his claims, and his expertise, as well as Robinson’s “expert report,” his Morrisseau expertise, his handwriting expertise, and his claim that Ms. Hatfield’s painting was a forgery. The photo is strong corroborative evidence that Judge Martial correctly saw through the Hoax as it unfolded in his courtroom, as a put-up job by two business pals. (PS. Every photo like this you’ve ever seen – on the nightly news on TV – features the Plaintiff with her lawyer, and absolutely NEVER cozying up to the “expert witness.” Why is her lawyer Jonathan Sommer not in this photo instead? Perhaps he is the one taking the picture as these three are the only people he brought into court to advance his case. NOTE: WHEN SOMMER PRESENTED THE COMBINED TESTIMONY OF THIS TEAM BEFORE THE HON MADAM JUSTICE SANDERSON, ON APPEAL, SHE DISMISSED IT OUTRIGHT, COMING OUT SWINGING, ONLY ELEVEN DAYS LATER, TOTALLY CORROBORATING JUDGE MARTIAL’S FINDING IN EVERY RESPECT, AND DISHING OUT THE SECOND OF TWO DISASTROUS COURT DEFEATS FOR THE LOSING LAWYER, JONATHAN SOMMER, AND HIS CLAIM THAT THERE ARE LOTS OF FAKES OUT THERE AND OFFERING THESE THREE AS THE PROOF…

This entry was posted in Art Cartel, BDPs - Black Drybrush Signed Painting, Canadian Cultural Vandals, Court Cases, Cyber Terrorism, Martial Court 2011 - 2013, Perjury or Dementia, Ritchie Sinclair. Bookmark the permalink.